Memorial Day

Vietnam Memorial at Sunset

phil.thuma

This is the memorial of my generation, decorated with the sun.
The last wars have not granite memorials, but remembrance in the heart.

Is Bush saying, "See, I toldja!"

White House: Bin Laden wanted Iraq as a new base.

If bin Laden had been caught, Bush wouldn't have had to look into a looking glass to help him decide to make war..

Disruptive?

Hair! (hair, hair, hair, hair, hair, hair)
Flow it, Show it;
Long as God can grow it, My Hair!

Chorus: Hair from the musical Hair

H/T ResurrectionSong

The Arrogance of Angels

I remember watching Cosmos: A Personal Voyage and Carl Sagan speaking about the destruction of Alexandria. He spoke of the library there and described how it has gone up in flames, then spoke of the lost of many books. I felt loss and wonder if there were any copies somewhere else in the ancient world or would anyone know. Then many years later Henry Louis Gates Jr. did a televised tour, Wonders of the African the World and one of the places he visited was Timbuktu in Mali. He found the place that had extremely old books. They were so old; it looked as if they would disintegrate if you blew on them. I wanted to know what was in all those books; to know what knowledge Africa possessed before. Science, mathematics and philosophy in the minds of ancients; we know some of it and yet, even what is known, it is not common knowledge.

Even though there is a debate over evolution, there is the sense among many people that they are different than the ancients. They have moved closer to angels. Their knowledge is almost perfect, they are closer to Eden and science and technology will propagate new science and technology forever. I see these people seeing themselves as angels. They have arrived at the top of the evolutionary scale. Their knowledge is possessed by Western Civilization exclusively, as these angels would see it. Thinking they are the first in creation, their ego destroys the world as they move about it. When we saw this in the extreme, they were called Nazis.

Since the tragedy of September 11, 2001; it is has become common for the angels to discuss their superior civilization, culture, religion and ethics. Since there is no understanding of the enemy and fear; others who do may not consider themselves angels, accept the angel’s knowledge as fact. The fear of others; any others has taken over their psyche. This knowledge has thrown a veil of safety in loathing and not on terrorism. Racism, Social Darwinism, and Eugenics are the new ideas of the 21st century.

Would it be possible to humble the angels with the knowledge of the ancients?

There's not been enough music here.

Cambry plays Chopin's Scherzo No.2



I have my son to thank for the intro.

Curious Stat Finding

Can someone tell me how does one reach my blog this way?
images.google.com/imgres?imqurl='image url'='my url'
How does the search start? These images are on my blog.
This may be very simple, but it eludes me.

Living, Life and Death

Viability, that is the defining word that determines the law on abortion. It has becomes unclear and further clouded when viability is extended through complicated medical procedures. We all know that when there is conception, the zygote becomes a living entity. Even the egg and sperm are considered living. After time, they both die if not becoming the zygote. For the Supreme Court purpose in the case Gonzales v.Carhart, the fetus is called the living fetus.

I have questions about being able to make any law regarding abortion, when we have a medical definition about when life ends, but not when life begins. It is agreed when one is born, that life has begun. Living does not mean there is life. We can be kept living by artificial means, when we are declared dead.If that person is known to be a transplant donor, they may be kept living until the organs and skin are harvested. Sometime the body will keep living, when we are clinically dead. Not everyone has agreed to this, but the law has left that to a family member or a designated proxy to decide in that case.

In this decision, Justice Kennedy discusses with preciseness, the details of abortion procedures and later makes judgment on which is the worst or most inhuman procedure.

We next determine whether the Act imposes an undue burden, as a facial matter, because its restrictions on second-trimester abortions are too broad. A review of the statutory text discloses the limits of its reach. The Act prohibits intact D&E; and, notwithstanding respondents’ arguments, it does not prohibit the D&E procedure in which the fetus is removed in parts.

The Act prohibits a doctor from intentionally performing an intact D&E. The dual prohibitions of the Act, both of which are necessary for criminal liability, correspond with the steps generally undertaken during this type of procedure. First, a doctor delivers the fetus until its head lodges in the cervix, which is usually past the anatomical landmark for a breech presentation. See 18 U. S. C. §1531(b)(1)(A) (2000 ed., Supp. IV). Second, the doctor proceeds to pierce the fetal skull with scissors or crush it with forceps. This step satisfies the overt-act requirement because it kills the fetus and is distinct from delivery. See §1531(b)(1)(B). The Act’s intentrequirements, however, limit its reach to those physicians who carry out the intact D&E after intending to undertake both steps at the outset.

The Act excludes most D&Es in which the fetus is removed in pieces, not intact. If the doctor intends to remove the fetus in parts from the outset, the doctor will not have the requisite intent to incur criminal liability. A doctor performing a standard D&E procedure can often “tak[e] about 10–15 ‘passes’ through the uterus to remove the entire fetus.” Planned Parenthood, 320 F. Supp. 2d, at 962. Removing the fetus in this manner does not violate the Act because the doctor will not have delivered the living fetus to one of the anatomical landmarks or committed an additional overt act that kills the fetus after partial delivery. §1531(b)(1) (2000 ed., Supp. IV).

If it is painful an regrettable, would it really make a difference how it happened? wouldn't the regret be in not having the child rather than how their pregnancy was terminated. If a doctor describe both procedures to me, I would be more squeamish about the D&E without meeting the anatomical landmark. He infers that we will get a crazy woman if she does this and I ask, wouldn't she be crazy if she had to deal with an unwanted child? Motherhood is not instinctive in humans or other primates, we learn the behavior. If it was instinctive, every woman would raise and feel the same about their children. What kind of legal argument is this?

Respect for human life finds an ultimate expression in the bond of love the mother has for her child. The Act recognizes this reality as well. Whether to have an abortion requires a difficult and painful moral decision. Casey, supra, at 852–853 (opinion of the Court). While we find no reliable data to measure the phenomenon, it seems unexceptionable to conclude some women come to regret their choice to abort the infant life they once created and sustained. See Brief for Sandra Cano et al. as Amici Curiae in No. 05–380, pp. 22–24. Severe depression and loss of esteem can follow. See ibid.

In a decision so fraught with emotional consequence some doctors may prefer not to disclose precise details of the means that will be used, confining themselves to the required statement of risks the procedure entails. From one standpoint this ought not to be surprising. Any number of patients facing imminent surgical procedures would prefer not to hear all details, lest the usual anxiety preceding invasive medical procedures become the more intense. This is likely the case with the abortion procedures here in issue. See, e.g.,Nat. Abortion Federation, 330 F. Supp. 2d, at 466, n. 22 (“Most of [the plaintiffs’] experts acknowledged that they do not describe to their patients what [the D&E and intact D&E] procedures entail in clear and precise terms”); see also id., at 479.

It is, however, precisely this lack of information concerning the way in which the fetus will be killed that is of legitimate concern to the State. Casey, supra, at 873 (plurality opinion) (“States are free to enact laws to provide a reasonable framework for a woman to make a decision that has such profound and lasting meaning”). The State has an interest in ensuring so grave a choice is well informed. It is self-evident that a mother who comes to regret her choice to abort must struggle with grief more anguished and sorrow more profound when she learns, only after the event, what she once did not know: that she allowed a doctor to pierce the skull and vacuum the fast-developing brain of her unborn child, a child assuming the human form.

It is a reasonable inference that a necessary effect of the regulation and the knowledge it conveys will be to encourage some women to carry the infant to full term, thus reducing the absolute number of late-term abortions. The medical profession, furthermore, may find different and less shocking methods to abort the fetus in the second trimester, thereby accommodating legislative demand. The State’s interest in respect for life is advanced by the dialogue that better informs the political and legal systems, the medical profession, expectant mothers, and society as a whole of the consequences that follow from a decision to elect a late-term abortion.

It is objected that the standard D&E is in some respects as brutal, if not more, than the intact D&E, so that the legislation accomplishes little. What we have already said, however, shows ample justification for the regulation. Partial-birth abortion, as defined by the Act, differs from a standard D&E because the former occurs when the fetus is partially outside the mother to the point of one of the Act’s anatomical landmarks. It was reasonable for Congress to think that partial-birth abortion, more than standard D&E, “undermines the public’s perception of the appropriate role of a physician during the delivery process, and perverts a process during which life is brought into the world.” Congressional Findings (14)(K), in notes following 18 U. S. C. §1531 (2000 ed., Supp. IV), p. 769. There would be a flaw in this Court’s logic, and an irony in its jurisprudence, were we first to conclude a ban on both D&E and intact D&E was overbroad and then to say it is irrational to ban only intact D&E because that does not proscribe both procedures. In sum, we reject the contention that the congressional purpose of the Act was “to place a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion.” 505 U. S., at 878 (plurality opinion).

Basically he saying its bad medicine.

As respondents have noted, and the District Courts recognized, some recitations in the Act are factually incorrect. See Nat. Abortion Federation, 330 F. Supp. 2d, at 482, 488–491. Whether or not accurate at the time, some of the important findings have been superseded. Two examples suffice. Congress determined no medical schools provide instruction on the prohibited procedure. Congressional Findings (14)(B), in notes following 18 U. S. C. §1531 (2000 ed., Supp. IV), p. 769. The testimony in the District Courts, however, demonstrated intact D&E is taught at medical schools. Nat. Abortion Federation, supra, at 490; Planned Parenthood, 320 F. Supp. 2d, at 1029. Congress also found there existed a medical consensus that the prohibited procedure is never medically necessary. Congressional Findings (1), in notes following 18 U. S. C. §1531 (2000 ed., Supp. IV), p. 767. The evidence presented in the District Courts contradicts that conclusion. See, e.g., Carhart, supra, at 1012–1015; Nat. Abortion Federation, supra, at 488–489; Planned Parenthood, supra, at 1025–1026. Uncritical deference to Congress’ factual findings in these cases is inappropriate.

Now for the decision.

Respondents have not demonstrated that the Act, as a facial matter, is void for vagueness, or that it imposes an undue burden on a woman’s right to abortion based on its overbreadth or lack of a health exception. For these reasons the judgments of the Courts of Appeals for the Eighth and Ninth Circuits are reversed.

It is so ordered.

Read the entire opinion

Have I missed something? The way I see it the law can't be rescinded, because there is no medical consensus that it would ever save the mothers life and that it is OK to do a D&E if there if there is no partial delivery.

Gliese 581

The NASA Image of the Day at top of this blog barely shows a picture of a star that has a planet that may have water and an atmosphere. It is one and a half times the size of the earth. Click on the picture for more details. After today find it here. It revolves around it sun every 14 days. I wonder if it has life on the planet; does life moves 26 times faster, than on earth?

The longest twenty seconds in my life.

I am back to work. Realized a few days before surgery that I didn't have as much sick time as I thought; so since the surgery went well, I went back to work a few weeks earlier. I was and am still a little sore, but I don't have to do any heavy lifting except to bring my big cup of coffee back to my desk. Anyways, a couple of weeks ago I received an email notifying me of an upcoming job fair with an utility company. I went this morning and was able to get three on the spot interviews. During one of the interviews, I got asked a question and at the moment I started to answer, I lost my train of thought. I even forgot the question. SCARY !!!! I still continued to talk trying to remember what the question was. I felt I couldn't dare ask him to repeat it. Fortunately, I did recover my memory and directed my conversation into answering the question. I hope the interviewer didn't notice. I hope it didn't take me any longer than twenty seconds to answer.
Since these are my first interviews in a few years, I have no idea if I was sucessful.

This Day

This morning I didn't realized that this day had been declared a Day of Mourning for the Virginia Tech victims until I recieved an e-mail at work. My mood changed from anger to sorrow when I read of Professor Liviu Librescu's funeral. This brought into reality, all of the families grief and pain.